REST APIs: Microservices vs. Enterprise Service Bus
Many organizations struggle with choosing the best platform for developing REST APIs. The meaning of “best” is polymorphic, could be the fastest time to market, the lowest operational cost, or the highest level of resilience and robustness. This choice is particularly challenging for startups, companies with monolithic core products, or those with hybrid development platforms.
This analysis framework aims to guide the decision-making process.
The Microservice Architecture Style
Microservices were developed to enhance the agility and flexibility of managing large code bases by numerous development teams simultaneously. The goal is to decouple development, deployment, testing, and operations into smaller, independent units managed by small, efficient teams (sometimes referred to as “two pizza teams”).
Key characteristics of microservices include:
- Autonomy and Independent Deployment: Each microservice functions as a small, standalone unit, allowing for separate development, testing and deployment.
- Independent Scalability: Services can scale individually, fitting well with cloud-native approaches for cost optimization.
- Technology Transparency: Services can use different tech stacks tailored to their specific tasks.
- Context Bound: Each microservice controls its data, managing updates and operations through its interface.
- Loose Coupling: Microservices avoid direct connections with each other, enhancing modularity, with exceptions like the BFF and orchestration patterns.
- Discoverability: Services are described by clear contracts, like the Open API Specification, for easy integration.
Companies adopting microservices organize software development into small, autonomous, fully functional teams. They embrace DevOps practices where teams manage their own service lifecycle. Management needs to adjust the role of centralized infrastructure teams to avoid becoming bottlenecks.
When adopting a microservice architecture organizations will spend more effort to set up the infrastructure, on data consistency, and on service interaction management. Teams have to become adept at designing for complexity, focusing on reliability (e.g. Circuit Breaker pattern), service discovery, orchestration, and communication. An API Gateway is a necessity for managing, securing, and routing requests, adding complexity but also benefits like load balancing. To ensure discoverability, API Management products are required.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
An ESB serves as an integration platform and proxies legacy systems with modern interfaces, such as REST APIS. Key characteristics are:
- Integration Platform: Facilitates API creation, data integration, and system connectivity.
- Layered Architecture: APIs are often structured in layers like Experience, Product, and System, resembling a monolithic approach, which is an architecture anti-pattern in microservices contexts.
- Ease of Use: Offers visual design tools, simplifying API creation for less specialized developers.
- Pre-built Connectors: Reduces custom code by providing connectors for various systems.
- Centralized Management: Streamlines API management, including security and analytics.
Companies adopting an ESB platform for REST API development will focus on hiring talent with a narrow, vendor specific skill set, can maintain a traditional infrastructure team and will face less complexity in developing and managing solutions. Solutions will not be portable, performance will decrease due to the platform’s overhead and licensing costs will be directly correlated with the throughput.
Comparison Considerations
- Control vs. Convenience: Microservices offer control at the cost of complexity; ESBs provide convenience with less customization.
- Flexibility vs. Control: ESBs excel in system connectivity but might limit detailed architectural control.
- Scalability: Microservices scale per service needs, saving operational costs when the average throughput is significantly lower than the peak demand; ESBs scale uniformly across services, which is less optimized for cost management.
- Learning Curve: ESBs might be easier for those new to microservices, focusing more on integration, but requires specialized training.
- Licensing Cost: Microservices generally incur lower licensing costs compared to vendor-locked ESBs.
- Performance: Microservices might allow for better performance tuning, while ESB abstractions can introduce overhead. Lower performane at the same throughput has higher hardware demands, which increases operational costs.
- Portability: Microservices are more portable within similar tech stacks; ESB solutions are often platform-dependent.
Choosing Between Microservices and ESB
Consider your project’s needs, team expertise, long-term scalability, and how much architectural control you require. While ESBs provide immediate time to market and cost benefits for project delivery at low to medium scale demands, companies need to account for growth projections to predict long term operational costs and TCOs.
References:
